ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ispcp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ispcp] Comments on Vertigal Integration

  • To: olivier.muron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ispcp] Comments on Vertigal Integration
  • From: maruyama@xxxxxxxxx (丸山直昌)
  • Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 23:32:17 +0900 (JST)
  • Cc: tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE0CBB31D9@ftrdmel1> (olivier.muron@orange-ftgroup.com)
  • List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: maruyama@xxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thanks Oliver.  I accept your revision.

Regards,

Masa.

>Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:31:11 +0200
>From: <olivier.muron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>Dear all,
>
>Thank you for the comments.
>
>I suggest to omit the contentious statement:
>"Again, and with regards to Principle No.3, which calls for the concept =
>of SRSU TLDs to be explored further, there is some feeling in our =
>Constituency that this should be addressed through another PDP".
>There is no consensus on this statement.
>
>More over I would suggest to drop the "more conservative" qualification =
>for the proposals and just describe the goals they are aiming at.
>
>See attached version with revisions marks,
>
>Best regards,
>Olivier

----
(Mr.) NaoMASA Maruyama
Japan Network Information Center(JPNIC)



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>