<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ispcp] RES: Call on August 3
- To: <maruyama@xxxxxxxxx>, <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ispcp] RES: Call on August 3
- From: "Tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:43:16 +0100
- Cc: <jaime@xxxxxx>, <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1280259798; bh=yibz2txmMKznnm57Y83ahDcCJpAuR1+UUlwIerMWDIw=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=bpVQcszgHxOlMdvHLmQTfmcgUMwhALf6iVSLbpHY9XnXhuSCu74/putIkctN7ZMTGQI0RgtO7nUpl+N0n9ps3Un7G1U+PjiYz+TmsDQyqEb7kWBxkssaZxOAPaundDMMzZUUOl9b1SfEpnD6P5UexaqJBUPudWpFEVQiQEVVcPw=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=zkZ4dXd7bR1ndSmUlQIDCDcvxqia6qZLQGovLhAxQ7QCdEKc8Bb3b6zVGhZWBq67lryBQ2zPm6gwav64YBhxfrLZC7q4///VITAnkjVsCsK2KSTbWqQWak0IP0ovQ+S5XOzg6mjNwWMoMbQJzKxo0vzyiveh9IitqfG0KlcMzj4= ;
- In-reply-to: <201007271826.o6RIQioN050386@surya.ism.ac.jp>
- List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <876A7E0B6D304652A090912A296C2111@harrys> (harris@cabase.org.ar) <201007271826.o6RIQioN050386@surya.ism.ac.jp>
- Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcstuYJk2+xKj/9fQTa18TcJL/bu8QACRBPA
Masa
I fully understand your difficulties. This call has been scheduled for a
while and I'm reluctant to change it now as other members have made their
arrangements to fit with this. The meeting will cover all current GNSO
issues prior to the following Council meeting. However I appreciate your
concerns over VI and will try and accommodate them.
During this meeting we will only look to review the draft position statement
that Tony Harris is leading on. The final statement can be agreed via email.
Can I suggest that you link up with Tony by email prior to the call and work
with him to produce a draft? If that results in you adopting opposing
positions, perhaps that can be made clear in the draft.
Hopefully that means you won't have to be present on the call, as its at
such an early hour in Japan.
Regards
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of MARUYAMA Naomasa
Sent: 27 July 2010 19:27
To: harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jaime@xxxxxx; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ispcp] RES: Call on August 3
>From: "Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:38:11 -0300
>ICANN News AlertTony,
>
>UTC 12.00 doesnt work for me, sorry.
>UTC 17.00 and on is ok for me.
UTC 17.00 August 3 is 2am of August 4 in Japan. It's not so
convenient for me, but still I feel I have to participate if the theme
will be our comment for VI initial report.
Masa.
----
(Mr.) NaoMASA Maruyama
Japan Network Information Center(JPNIC)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|