<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ispcp] RES: Call on August 3
- To: "'Jaime Wagner - CGI'" <jaime@xxxxxx>, <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ispcp] RES: Call on August 3
- From: "Tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:54:47 +0100
- Cc: "Gisella Gruber-White" <Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1280253289; bh=AlXk5hf9inRGs+gcjL5i6WtDKLFMiHNxzdfmsW1c0vE=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=Q2nBpi4wYL5C9oHezHbTvcYmIiL7tMrvgM5cr42dLyT4UBq08bp931ak9RzEJjwCDT4NRjaInnj8uSKjMWHd9275ezvBTzuoePx71pZA+xIpjDQ5VA0MQxSyJPi8GvWGbqvbBxrN/aOxPhNZLEIU1+SpXUjTdyYy5xrCvDtvZsA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=NTy8YVVH4c4dFoEGzYQNzB/+QW8CoY2TXRLN1JmeeU72jY/3vliiRQe6E3M2PJQ88rbf7MwbCb5SNdENyKLUL4xyHtI3bHD58yAcgL3FDtozZgtmEDq7PDE8gzjexRV0lXCMS6cRG7dRqp7PDja7clxNaNlmuN5IRY9GquodOfs= ;
- In-reply-to: <16AB7D0EB93D8840A2367AD258D15439043C9CF1@FLDP1LUMXCV31.us.one.verizon.com>
- List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <592F47825989E0468B5D719E571C6AEE0226E894@s4de8dsaanr.west.t-com.de> <008c01cb2cf8$1df55500$59dfff00$@com> <2F45AC3F46D64F20AA241C4026A383C5@harrys> <003b01cb2d34$ad85fda0$0891f8e0$@br> <001701cb2d56$b87c43a0$2974cae0$@com> <876A7E0B6D304652A090912A296C2111@harrys> <16AB7D0EB93D8840A2367AD258D15439043C9CF1@FLDP1LUMXCV31.us.one.verizon.com>
- Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcstkcI8Tx9/ntOFQLCqbt+wHu3PzQAIJdsAAAB4uhA=
Dear ISPCP members
In view of the differing responses to the request to change the time of the
call, we will have to stick to the original time of 14.00 UTC on 3rd August.
Apologies to those struggling with this time.
Regards
Tony
From: Mansourkia, Magnolia [mailto:maggie.mansourkia@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 27 July 2010 18:38
To: Anthony Harris; Tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jaime Wagner - CGI;
ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ispcp] RES: Call on August 3
I'll be on holiday that week, but plan to join the call at 14.00. I don't
mind changing earlier to 12.00 but cannot do later at 17.00
_____
From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Anthony Harris
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 9:38 AM
To: Tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Jaime Wagner - CGI'; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ispcp] RES: Call on August 3
Tony,
UTC 12.00 doesnt work for me, sorry.
UTC 17.00 and on is ok for me.
Tony Harris
----- Original Message -----
From: Tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: 'Jaime Wagner - CGI' <mailto:jaime@xxxxxx> ; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 3:41 AM
Subject: RE: [ispcp] RES: Call on August 3
Jaime/All
I have no problems changing the time providing nobody who plans to join the
call objects.
Please let me know if this will cause difficulties by the end of Thursday
29th. If there is an objection we will stick with the agreed time.
In addition please indicate whether it's preferable to move the call forward
or back.
Tony
From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jaime Wagner - CGI
Sent: 27 July 2010 03:38
To: tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ispcp] RES: Call on August 3
Our call is confirmed for August, 3 at 14:00 UTC?
Could it be anticipated to 12:00 UTC? Or postponed to 17:00UTC or after?
Jaime Wagner
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|