<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RES: [ispcp] COMMENTS ON VERTICAL INTEGRATION
- To: "'Anthony Harris'" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RES: [ispcp] COMMENTS ON VERTICAL INTEGRATION
- From: "Jaime Plug In" <jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 17:25:47 -0300
- In-reply-to: <F764121E927443E1BEAFB734A2967C3F@harrys>
- List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <F764121E927443E1BEAFB734A2967C3F@harrys>
- Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcrsoqYoFV4z8SwKRtyKqeWfhSv13wAjUTgg
Very good work Tony,
I noted you didn't mention the threshold number of domains for the
exceptions to vanish.
I thought that was a good idea, although I found the figure of 50000 in the
PIR proposal too small.
Think we could mention this as a possibility avoiding the reference to a
specific figure.
Jaime Wagner
<mailto:jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cel (51) 8126-0916
Fax (51) 3123-1708
De: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Em nome
de Anthony Harris
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 5 de maio de 2010 19:19
Para: tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Assunto: [ispcp] COMMENTS ON VERTICAL INTEGRATION
Guys,
This is the best I could come up with, please help
improve it...
Tony Harris
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|