[ispcp] AW: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
On behalf of the ISPCP constituency I'd like to suggest the following edit regarding "Support Teams" (ST). The draft amendment attached is targeted to provide more flexibility to the Review Teams in order to let themselves organize their support teams rather than to constitute support teams in advance. Looking forward to a fruitful discussion Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010 23:35 An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx Betreff: RE: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR Thanks Wolf. If you could propose a suggested edit, it would be very helpful. Chuck > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:36 PM > To: william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: AW: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR > > > Following a consultation within the ISPCP constituency I'd > like to address the creation of "Support Teams" (ST). There > must be a clear distinction between the RTs and potential STs > in order to avoid STs emerging to "shadow" RTs. So the > composition of the ST pools has carefully to be taken into > consideration or should even be regulated. If applicable > this should be expressed in the council response. > > Apart from that the ISPCP constituency endorses the draft response. > > Wolf-Ulrich > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von William Drake > Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Januar 2010 16:40 > An: GNSO Council List > Betreff: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR > > Hello, > > Attached please find the drafting team's proposed response to > the draft proposal on the Affirmation Reviews Requirements > and Implementation Processes, for discussion with our > respective SGs and in the Council. > > Best, > > Bill > > > Attachment:
Council_response_ISPCP_comment.doc
|