ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ispcp]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ispcp] WG: [council] Decision on whether to initiate a PDP regarding vertical integration of registries & registrars

  • To: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [ispcp] WG: [council] Decision on whether to initiate a PDP regarding vertical integration of registries & registrars
  • From: "Tony Holmes" <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:55:57 -0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=47y+gGUDC++3u1WBVWmd+bz8lrhAH1tGOgd3Az6YAw7YUxSdxqmy6wAddIG2A5UUm6BmXyuKTDasocUNTHwkHMI84+/QnkMu7rcZDb5v8XxmAkXm0eVwl5qAWt0OiSIUn5oG5e4dziqZbmLM84pfZd6yNUU1EQgp2gNa0EKdldg= ;
  • In-reply-to: <592F47825989E0468B5D719E571C6AEEA91F9A@s4de8dsaanr.west.t-com.de>
  • List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <592F47825989E0468B5D719E571C6AEEA91F9A@s4de8dsaanr.west.t-com.de>
  • Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcpuFRjgcupuOZGOQsO9Hzd+EBHBRABJdyawAAEYVtA=
Wolf-Ulrich - I agree with you.

 

Tony

 

From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 27 November 2009 08:31
To: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ispcp] WG: [council] Decision on whether to initiate a PDP
regarding vertical integration of registries & registrars

 

Dear colleagues,

 

I forward this message to you asking for comments on the question of urgency
of the subject. My personal opinion is that from an ISPCP point of view the
council should carefully discuss the item rather to decide on a PDP
initiation in a hurry. So if I don't get different opinion from your side by
Tuesday next week I'll Chuck inform accordingly

 

Thanks and have a nice weekend

Wolf-Ulrich 

 

 

 

  _____  

Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. November 2009 22:20
An: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [council] Decision on whether to initiate a PDP regarding vertical
integration of registries & registrars

In anticipation of receiving the Vertical Separation of Registries and
Registrars Issues Report  the end of next week (4 Dec), the current Bylaws
require "the Council shall meet within fifteen (15) calendar days after
receipt of such Report to vote on whether to initiate the PDP."  That means
we need a motion (or motions) for our next meeting on 17 Dec.

 

It seems to me that for an issue like this that will be somewhat
complicated, making a decision on initiating a PDP within as little as 13
days of receiving the issues report may be challenging, and even more so
this time of year.  Also, we will not have finished our project
prioritization exercise by then.  On the other hand, to the extent that a
PDP could possibly result in delays of the introduction of new gTLDs, I
think we don't want to contribute to any more delays if avoidable.  

 

So I am requesting Councilors to express your opinions in this regard.
Should we consider deferring the PDP decision until January or should we
vote on whether to initiate a PDP in our 17 Dec meeting?  Note that we have
two meetings in January on the 7th and the 28th.  Your thoughts are
requested.

 

Chuck
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>