[ispcp]
All The attached document is the result of work done by representatives of the IP, ISP and BC constituencies (Tony Holmes for the ISPCP) to find common ground between our three constituencies so that a basis to go forward with GNSO reform can be established. The logic, particularly recognizing the short time frame between the Cairo and Mexico City meetings (and certain milestones that need to be met), is to ask our constituencies to weigh in on which of the three models they would like to pursue: Constituency, Collapsed, or Transitional. Ideally each constituency might rank them in the order of most to least desirable to assist further work. Discussions within the ISPCP to date lean heavily towards the Constituency model, so if you have another view its important to respond promptly to the list. The objective is try to have feedback on this - and a decision - by the end of the Cairo meeting. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Regards from Cairo Tony Attachment:
GNSO Reform team v3 email re model.DOC |