<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ispcp] Draft statement on gNSO reform implementation issues
- To: mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxx, ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ispcp] Draft statement on gNSO reform implementation issues
- From: Greg Ruth <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=asO+pJJ6SceC9enrdQo8jJLLyXcueL/ckZTrFlWkg+VZA2dt4+tJsV4qPMReZeo5S7O9+tBebcMB+OV6ppzk5UIm1jFYbC1bdvmCjaYeTr9vJmzIr04EK3xca9j0ORMvYExhdUXkr6o+0b22plUO0x2wG/VNNNqGl5/XBvm+Bz8=;
- List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Looks fine to me. There seems to be a typo in the first paragraph of section 2 "for an interim period one NCA appointee would made to each house"
Greg
----- Original Message ----
From: Mark McFadden <mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:48:55 AM
Subject: [ispcp] Draft statement on gNSO reform implementation issues
Based on the last ISPCP teleconference, a draft ISPCP statement on gNSO reform implementation issues has been produced. It is attached to this mail message.
We need to have comments pretty quickly because the deadline for submitting these comments is almost upon us.
Please “reply-all” any comments you might have on this short draft.
Thanks for your prompt attention!
Mark
Mark McFadden
Secretariat, ISPCP
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|