ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ispcp]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RES: [ispcp] DRAFT position paper on introduction of new gTLDs

  • To: "'Anthony Harris'" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <tony.ar.holmes@xxxxxx>, <mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RES: [ispcp] DRAFT position paper on introduction of new gTLDs
  • From: "Antonio Tavares" <atavares@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:11:10 -0200
  • In-reply-to: <02f301c625ce$69276d00$7801a8c0@harris2>
  • Organization: DIALDATA
  • Reply-to: <atavares@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcYlzodLQIUVVN+eSQ+mV9+yEDYKAgAkKWhg
Mark and Tony

I did ammended some points. Pls check and see if you agree

Best Regards

Antonio 


ANTÓNIO TAVARES

-----Mensagem original-----
De: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Em nome
de Anthony Harris
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 30 de janeiro de 2006 16:53
Para: tony.ar.holmes@xxxxxx; mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Assunto: Re: [ispcp] DRAFT position paper on introduction of new gTLDs

I am comfortable with these edits.

Tony Harris

----- Original Message -----
From: <tony.ar.holmes@xxxxxx>
To: <mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 1:33 PM
Subject: RE: [ispcp] DRAFT position paper on introduction of new gTLDs


Mark

Nice job!

Thanks for doing this.

I've attached a word version with some proposed minor changes and a
couple of issues requiring clarification.

I assume you will submit the final agreed version to Glen?

Regards

Tony 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mark McFadden
Sent: 27 January 2006 16:54
To: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ispcp] DRAFT position paper on introduction of new gTLDs
Importance: High

All:

I've prepared a draft position paper on the introduction of new gTLDs in

the DNS namespace.  I'm hoping you may have comments on this paper.

It effectively restates a position we took in April of 2005.

For those of you who know my personal views, you should know that the 
document DOES NOT advocate the end of new proposals for new TLDs.  I 
thought that was imposing too much of my personal view on the
constituency.

Looking forward to your comments.

mark


File: ISPCP Position on New gTLD Expansion - january 2005.pdf


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.23/243 - Release Date: 27/1/2006
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.25/246 - Release Date: 30/1/2006

Attachment: ISPCP Position on New gTLD Expansion TH cooments (2).doc
Description: MS-Word document

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>