ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ispcp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ispcp] A request from the community

  • To: Mark McFadden <mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ispcp] A request from the community
  • From: Greg Ruth <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 06:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
  • Cc: mcf@xxxxxxx
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=5BAEeQItls8lSmA4OV/g2fu97oCAsMT40aEzI9silqzqiYyGbM9mBBXKrivd2+gxDJap/Y3NLp40p4Ta7XaJ9nQ0vdTZ9lKMf+aCqr9voDLxxtMS8+K8iLoc5tbNA1pHGsjHqj56Pp6d1kisimQzR2HfoHeJ3Iq8n9eg9jRcbOk= ;
  • In-reply-to: <200507121248.j6CCmsTC095126@mmm709.vwh1.net>
  • Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Mark,
    I think giving our statement to Vint is a splendid idea.  However,
if he is looking for facts to support a cogent argument against
adopting the current strat plan, namely *why* the strat plan is not a
consensus document, someone would have to give him more ammunition than
our statement contains.  Yes, we went over all that at Mar del Plata,
but some memories are short.

My $0.02,
Greg

--- Mark McFadden <mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> All:
> 
> Vint Cerf has asked to see out DRAFT statement on the strategic plan.
>  He would like to see it today.  I haven't supplied it to him --
> prior to getting approval from the constituency.
> 
> If you have objections to giving Vint a copy of the DRAFT version of
> the statement, let me know by 1630 today, Luxembourg time.  If I hear
> objections, I'll forward a reasonable message to Vint.
> 
> mark
> 
> 
> Mark McFadden
> 21st Century Texts
> Madison Wisconsin
> mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>