<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RES: [ispcp] ISPCP Statement on Adoption of the Current Strategic Plan -- FOR COMMENT
- To: "'Your Name'" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Mark McFadden'" <mcf@xxxxxxx>, <ISPCP@xxxxxxxxx>, <mcf@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RES: [ispcp] ISPCP Statement on Adoption of the Current Strategic Plan -- FOR COMMENT
- From: "Antonio Tavares" <atavares@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 07:39:23 -0300
- In-reply-to: <E1DsI1s-0000Yr-2P@washington.noc11.net>
- Organization: DIALDATA
- Reply-to: <atavares@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcWGy/xXn734vXX7RP2aaOmSaCqSzAAAe24A
I'm also ok with this
ANTÓNIO TAVARES
-----Mensagem original-----
De: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Em nome
de Your Name
Enviada em: terça-feira, 12 de julho de 2005 07:30
Para: Mark McFadden; ISPCP@xxxxxxxxx; mcf@xxxxxxx
Assunto: Re: [ispcp] ISPCP Statement on Adoption of the Current Strategic
Plan -- FOR COMMENT
Mark,
OK with me
Tony Harris
> The ISPCP Constituency urges the ICANN Board not to ratify, adopt, or
approve
> the current Strateigc Plan in its current form.
>
> The current Strategic Plan simply does not have the consensus of the
ICANN
> Community. Ratifying the Strategic Plan would confer an stamp of
authority on
> the plan that is inappropriate. It would also codify strategic goals
which do
> not have the consensus buy-in of the ICANN community.
>
> Instead, the ISPCP community thinks the current Strategic Plan should
remain as
> a guide and historically significant document for ICANN's work until a
> Strategic Plan emerges from the revised planning process underway
this week.
>
> Some have suggested that the current Strategic Plan is needed as a
defense
> against organizations who might be inclined to suggest that ICANN has
no plan
> or vision for the future. We do not agree. ICANN has an operational
plan that
> takes us through the next year that defines, very clearly, short-term
goals for
> the organization. In addition, an open and participative planning
process is
> currently beging developed for the next planning cycle.
>
> The ISPCP constituency remains committed to the strategic planning
process and
> many of our members have participated in this week's group planning
process.
> However, adopting the current version of the Strategic Plan would be a
> significant retreat from the basic principle of consensus development
of policy
> and plans for our organization. We urge all members of the board to
not
> formally adopt or ratify the current Strategic Plan.
> --
> Mark McFadden
> Internet and Security Programs
> University of Wisconsin Milwaukee
> School of Continuing Education
> 161 W. Wisconsin Ave., Suite 6000
> Milwaukee, WI 53203
> v: 414-227-3243
> e: mcf@xxxxxxx
> w: http://www.sce.uwm.edu
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.12/46 - Release Date: 11/7/2005
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.12/46 - Release Date: 11/7/2005
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|