ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ispcp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RES: [ispcp] ISPCP Statement on Adoption of the Current Strategic Plan -- FOR COMMENT

  • To: "'Your Name'" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Mark McFadden'" <mcf@xxxxxxx>, <ISPCP@xxxxxxxxx>, <mcf@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RES: [ispcp] ISPCP Statement on Adoption of the Current Strategic Plan -- FOR COMMENT
  • From: "Antonio Tavares" <atavares@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 07:39:23 -0300
  • In-reply-to: <E1DsI1s-0000Yr-2P@washington.noc11.net>
  • Organization: DIALDATA
  • Reply-to: <atavares@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcWGy/xXn734vXX7RP2aaOmSaCqSzAAAe24A

I'm also ok with this 


ANTÓNIO TAVARES

-----Mensagem original-----
De: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Em nome
de Your Name
Enviada em: terça-feira, 12 de julho de 2005 07:30
Para: Mark McFadden; ISPCP@xxxxxxxxx; mcf@xxxxxxx
Assunto: Re: [ispcp] ISPCP Statement on Adoption of the Current Strategic
Plan -- FOR COMMENT

Mark,

OK with me

Tony Harris

> The ISPCP Constituency urges the ICANN Board not to ratify, adopt, or
approve
> the current Strateigc Plan in its current form.
> 
> The current Strategic Plan simply does not have the consensus of the
ICANN
> Community.  Ratifying the Strategic Plan would confer an stamp of
authority on
> the plan that is inappropriate.  It would also codify strategic goals
which do
> not have the consensus buy-in of the ICANN community.
> 
> Instead, the ISPCP community thinks the current Strategic Plan should
remain as
> a guide and historically significant document for ICANN's work until a 
> Strategic Plan emerges from the revised planning process underway
this week.
> 
> Some have suggested that the current Strategic Plan is needed as a
defense
> against organizations who might be inclined to suggest that ICANN has
no plan
> or vision for the future.  We do not agree.  ICANN has an operational
plan that
> takes us through the next year that defines, very clearly, short-term
goals for
> the organization.  In addition, an open and participative planning
process is
> currently beging developed for the next planning cycle.
> 
> The ISPCP constituency remains committed to the strategic planning
process and
> many of our members have participated in this week's group planning
process. 
> However, adopting the current version of the Strategic Plan would be a 
> significant retreat from the basic principle of consensus development
of policy
> and plans for our organization.  We urge all members of the board to
not
> formally adopt or ratify the current Strategic Plan.
> --
> Mark McFadden
> Internet and Security Programs
> University of Wisconsin Milwaukee
> School of Continuing Education
> 161 W. Wisconsin Ave., Suite 6000
> Milwaukee, WI 53203
> v: 414-227-3243
> e: mcf@xxxxxxx
> w: http://www.sce.uwm.edu
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.12/46 - Release Date: 11/7/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.12/46 - Release Date: 11/7/2005
 





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>