<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Circle Jerk
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Circle Jerk
- From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:21:53 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=on8WUg1M1ynAW82Yg/uw+XerPWdfzb8VFk6GyKyHS3+kq2Ay/87Vjqjli5WYOnLU; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Danny and all,
Yep, I concur, another circle jerk indeed. However that
is the "ICANN Way" isn't it.
-----Original Message-----
>From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Aug 29, 2007 12:05 PM
>To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [ga] Circle Jerk
>
>http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg03777.html
>
>"Here is a proposed resolution from the Business
>Constituency:
>
>1. The GNSO Council hereby accepts the WG report and
>acknowledges the tremendous effort by WG participants
>and ICANN staff.
>2. The GNSO Council particularly recognizes the WG
>chair for his adept leadership through a contentious
>and controversial WG process.
>3. The GNSO Council does not consider the WG report as
>an adequate basis for any implementation of OPOC.
>4. The GNSO Council requests that ICANN staff proceed
>with the 4 studies described in Section 8 of the WG
>report, as follows:
>
> 1. Proceed with study 4 on the characteristics of the
>Whois database first. This study should include a
>review and analysis of the
>different proxy services.
> 2. Following completion of study 4, and to the extent
>it reveals that there is a problem with the current
>Whois policy, ICANN Staff should proceed with study
>one - the cost/benefit analysis. Completion of study
>4 should help determine the parameters of the
>cost/benefit analysis, since the scope of the problem
>will be known and documented.
> 3. To the extent that the cost/benefit analysis
>determines that the benefits of changing the Whois
>policy exceed the costs, ICANN Staff should proceed
>with a third study that merges study two on
>self-certification (this should include an analysis of
>an ex post facto review mechanism) and study 3 on
>authentication (which should include authentication of
>any parties with a legitimate interest in the data)."
>
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________________________________
=======
'Regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|