ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Circle Jerk

  • To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Circle Jerk
  • From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:21:53 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=on8WUg1M1ynAW82Yg/uw+XerPWdfzb8VFk6GyKyHS3+kq2Ay/87Vjqjli5WYOnLU; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
  • Reply-to: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Danny and all,

  Yep, I concur, another circle jerk indeed.  However that
is the "ICANN Way" isn't it.  

-----Original Message-----
>From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Aug 29, 2007 12:05 PM
>To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [ga] Circle Jerk
>
>http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg03777.html
>
>"Here is a proposed resolution from the Business
>Constituency:
>
>1.	The GNSO Council hereby accepts the WG report and
>acknowledges the tremendous effort by WG participants
>and ICANN staff.  
>2.	The GNSO Council particularly recognizes the WG
>chair for his adept leadership through a contentious
>and controversial WG process. 
>3.	The GNSO Council does not consider the WG report as
>an adequate basis for any implementation of OPOC. 
>4.	The GNSO Council requests that ICANN staff proceed
>with the 4 studies described in Section 8 of the WG
>report, as follows: 
>
>	1.	Proceed with study 4 on the characteristics of the
>Whois database first.  This study should include a
>review and analysis of the
>different proxy services.  
>	2.	Following completion of study 4, and to the extent
>it reveals that there is a problem with the current
>Whois policy, ICANN Staff should proceed with study
>one - the cost/benefit analysis.  Completion of study
>4 should help determine the parameters of the
>cost/benefit analysis, since the scope of the problem
>will be known and documented. 
>	3.	To the extent that the cost/benefit analysis
>determines that the benefits of changing the Whois
>policy exceed the costs, ICANN Staff should proceed
>with a third study that merges study two on
>self-certification (this should include an analysis of
>an ex post facto review mechanism) and study 3 on
>authentication (which should include authentication of
>any parties with a legitimate interest in the data)."
>
>
>
>       
>____________________________________________________________________________________
======= 

'Regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>