RE: [ga] Amendment to List Rules

["Debbie Garside" <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jeff
 
I am short on time at the moment.  If you want to have your amendments
processed in the next phase please at least attach them to an email
(privately).  I do not remember anyone agreeing with proposals or indeed any
specific proposals which is why I have asked you to post again.  As you post
at least 5 times a day I do not have time to go through it all.  Sorry.  If
anyone else would like to take over as "Editor" due to my lack of time at
the moment feel free, otherwise please assist with the task.
 
Thanks
 
Debbie


  _____  

From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 24 August 2007 02:38
To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ga] Amendment to List Rules



Debbie and all,

 

  No I will not do so again as I have already done so twice.  Those are in
the

archives and should have been noted at the time in which they were posted.




-----Original Message----- 
From: Debbie Garside 
Sent: Aug 23, 2007 4:43 AM 
To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: RE: [ga] Amendment to List Rules 


Hi Jeff
 
Can you please produce the proposed text for the amendments in order that
they may be considered/adopted by the members.  I will then add them within
the next update - assuming members are in agreement.
 
Best
 
Debbie


  _____  

From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 23 August 2007 01:16
To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ga] Amendment to List Rules



Mr. Dierker and all,

 

  Perhaps you need a new glasses perscription as I have sent now 5

different objections and/or amendments as well as one additional

change to list rules.  So I believe has Ted.  See archives.




-----Original Message----- 
From: Hugh Dierker 
Sent: Aug 22, 2007 11:17 AM 
To: "Prophet Partners Inc." , ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: Re: [ga] Amendment to List Rules 


I have yet to see an objection to the ministerial changes to the List Rules.
The following are noted in favor of it; Josh, Ted, Eric, Jeff, Joe and I
think I missed two.
 
Let us watch for a few more days for objection, or more likely lack thereof,
and then impose upon Debbie to make the changes.
 
Eric
as Chair

"Prophet Partners Inc." <Domains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As per the Chair's request on August 18th, this is the 2nd consecutive daily
post.
 
Now that the GA has officially adopted the GA List Rules, I motion that we
amend the GA List Rules to:

1 - correct the typos with email addresses containing @dnso.org and
@gnso.org and replace them with @gnso.icann.org
2 - clarify that prohibition of legal threats is solely directed at personal
attacks against other GA members and expressly omits discussion of lawsuits
pertaining to GA business. Such discussion would not constitute a violation
of the GA List Rules.
 
I am not a lawyer and these are only my personal opinions. If you require
legal advice, you should seek qualified legal counsel.
 
Sincerely,
Ted
Prophet Partners Inc.
http://www.ProphetPartners.com
http://www.Premium-Domain-Names.com




==========

Regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx