Re: [ga] Voting on the rules, Regarding: 5. VERIFICATION OF PARTICIPANTS

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mr.Dierker and all,

Regarding: 5. VERIFICATION OF PARTICIPANTS

 As you know, in the state of Calif.  requesting a copy of
a persons drivers lic. for any non criminal investigation is
against Calif. law.  In Texas, my home state, this is also
so.  It is also a violation in Texas to transmit a copy your
or anyone elses drivers lic. to anyone other than a law
enforcement officer, or without cerification.  As I am a
reserve Texas State law enforcement officer, I am duty
bound to report this proposed rule as a potential intent
violation of said reciprocity statutes accordingly.  I shall
do so along with a copy and/or copies of your eMails in
this regard tomorrow, as I am required to do along with a
signed complaint accordingly.

  As ICANN is a Calif. Corp. not a club as you have
contended, although ICANN may behaive like a club
much of the time, I strongly recomend this rule either
be struck entirely or significantly amended removing
any and all language regarding Drivers Lic. copies
being sent to unknown individuals, non certified/licensed 
and/or non law enforcment officers properly certified for
verification of such or similar documents.  As a
suggestion only, FOIA requests for certain verification
documentation is the better way to go here.

And btw, I have seen several eMail addresses along
with several eMails which I have in my archives
with your name associated with many different
eMail address.
To wit: "Eric  Dierker (Now chief of VN global marketing)"
<cis@xxxxxxxxx>
Eric Dierker <Eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
eric Dierker #2 <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
eric Dierker #3 <eric@xxxxxxxxx>
"Dr. Eric Dierker" <ericdierker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Of course, if you wish to withdraw the language regarding
drivers lic. information, I shall withdraw and/or postpone my
report and complaint accordingly.

  Given the poor language of this proposed rule I cannot
legally challenge anyone effectively. As such, it seems
a rather moronic rule as there are as I have already
stated, several other more effective, safe, and non
obtrusive methods by which this can be reasonably
accomplished, (see archives starting 2002 forward ).



Hugh Dierker wrote:

>    The final rules are posted at;
> http://www.geolang.com/draftGAListRules5.htm
>   or
>   http://www.geolang.com/draftGAListRules5.txt
>
>   Refer to them as List Rules - Draft 5 for vote.
>
>   Continuing during the next five days I will post this notice that
> the rules will be voted on in public on the list by a yes or no vote.
> Dates of voting will be Aug 12 - 14. We have no booth. Only members
> will be entitled to vote. We will lose voters due to the public nature
> of list voting. Some of these will be due to their positions and that
> is just the way it is at this time. It will be important for those
> with the courage and ability to render a vote to do so. Clearly the
> higher the participation the higher the credibility of this list
> forum.
>
>   Eric
>
>

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827