Fwd: [ga] List Rules, Truth of Representations

["Joshua Brady" <somitho@xxxxxxxxx>]

Since it seems to take a public statement, Jeff how about some answers?


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joshua Brady <somitho@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 11:21:14 -0400
Subject: Re: [ga] List Rules, Truth of Representations
To: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Jeff,

The mailto reply sends the email to the party who replied, so reply to
all is quicker and used by most. The CC issue was with people who
added in non involved parties.

Please be kind enough to point out in my reply where I said I
singularly used Google, or even used Google at all.

Mind pointing out where I, not JFC involved you into this? Where did I
make a libelious claim/statement?

I can't seem to find this, unless you are a stating you are a medical
doctor giving bad advice?

Also point out who George is, and why you decided to make statements
that are not fact against me.

-Josh


On 8/5/07, jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> JFC and all,
>
>   Please try to remember to trim your CC's when
> responding.
>
>   I agree with your well reasoned analysis here, JFC.
> It is clear that this Josh is irritated for reasons
> he will not rectify himself and relies on errant
> search facilities < i.e. Google ect. > for his only
> source of information.  Bad practice that, but certainly
> his right or choice.
>
>   My identity is well known and well documented at
> many creditable organizations, courts of law, government
> entities, web sites, ect.  What is really at issue
> regarding myself is my arguments for or against others
> considerations.  The politics of personal distruction or
> defamination by innuendo ect., is seemingly an excepted
> practice in some quareters for reasons which are seemingly
> largely based on individuals choice in means or methods
> of expression.  This too is a very bad practice as you
> have pointed out, amongst others.
>
>   However if Josh, George, or anyone wishes to challange
> me in open court regarding me, my positions, my existance,
> or qualifications, as always, I await their service.
>
>   What is a shame is our chair, Dr. Dierker has decided
> all on his own that he is the final arbiter.  He is of
> course mistaken, and as chair should remain nutural.
>
>   What Josh and/or George are afraid of is individual
> representation of domain name holders having their
> proper representation as a constituency withing ICANN.
> It seems fairly clear that the ICANN Bod and staff
> share in this fear.
>
>   I am a firm believer of freedom of expression and
> make no bones about it.  I believe I stand in very good
> company in holding that position.  It seems Dr. Dierker,
> Debbie, and Josh are firm believers in Censorship. Censorship
> in any of it's ugly forms is wrong and in my country, is
> extra legal.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: JFC Morfin <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Aug 4, 2007 11:21 AM
> >To: Joshua Brady <somitho@xxxxxxxxx>, GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Re: [ga] List Rules, Truth of Representations
> >
> >At 17:26 04/08/2007, Joshua Brady wrote:
> >>I fully support this and propose that members who misrepresent
> >>themselves be permanently removed from the list.
> >
> >Dear Josh,
> >I am afraid this is totally out of context and countrary to the ICANN
> >and users best interests.
> >
> >The GNSO is supposed to be an ICANN BoD support organisation. The GA
> >is not to represent people but to float ideas and permit debates that
> >can be of use to BoD Members. You are fully entitled to create a
> >DNHolder constituency, to join ALAC, etc. if you want to live among
> >identified people. The need here is not for identified people but for
> >pertinent inputs.
> >
> >I would be extremely happy if I discovered that Jeff is George Bush
> >or Vint Cerf in disguise as we thought one of the Jeffies might be a
> >long ago. The purpose of the GA is precisely to permit debated inputs
> >from knowledgable people who do not necessarily want to identify
> >themselves and join a constituency (or are prevented to join their
> >own constituency :-)). When competent these people usually are pertinent.
> >
> >IMHO all this debate among 15 people in order to definitly kill the
> >GA is a pure waste of time, detrimental to ICANN, and just a way to
> >increase the number of responses when googling "ICANN GNSO abcd" for
> >the abcd persons' internet governance pseudo-credibility.
> >jfc
> >
> >
> >
>
> Regards,
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
> "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
>    Abraham Lincoln
>
> "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
> often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
>
> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
> depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> ===============================================================
> Updated 1/26/04
> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
> Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
> ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827
>
>