ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] List Rules

  • To: GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] List Rules
  • From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:40:12 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=GTFP/VvtplAYkgZCeBhkCsGoAYs86LXgZJGoNvyLxE6x5Q9vv76YclJKMyZw9S0Z; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
  • Reply-to: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}</STYLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3132" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=compText>
<P>Dr. Dierker and all,</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp; Interesting reference.&nbsp; I could however not fine it in Thomas.&nbsp; However,</P>
<P>Lorain would seem to disagree with the asserted intent to which you</P>
<P>reference this.&nbsp; </P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp; In any event, this is not a court of law and has no force certain or</P>
<P>related accordingly, and from what I have seen so far, there is no</P>
<P>"Rough Consensus" and has been no vote by the members for</P>
<P>these rules as referenced.</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp; However your point is likely not missed entirely.&nbsp; <BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Hugh Dierker <HDIERKER2204@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: Jul 28, 2007 8:12 AM <BR>To: GA <GA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject: [ga] List Rules <BR><BR>
<DIV>In California, the home of ICANN, there is a concept that one can voice themselves by being quiet. To be sure there are many elements required for this to be true and many situations which all have their own subset of rules. As we have scene in the "important new ruling" questions of notice and acquiescience are complicated.</DIV>
<DIV><A href="http://pub.bna.com/eclr/0675424_071807.pdf"; target=_blank><SPAN id=lw_1185627848_1 style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%"><FONT color=#003399>http://pub.bna.com/eclr/0675424_071807.pdf</FONT></SPAN></A><BR></DIV>
<DIV>So I hereby give notice that a silence regarding the proposed new rules will not be considered an objection thereto. It will be considered neutral or in favor.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>It may or may not be enforceable. But at least it gets the point accross.</DIV>
<DIV><A href="http://www.geolang.com/draftGAListRulesV3.htm"; target=_blank rel=nofollow><SPAN id=lw_1185425297_0 style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%"><FONT color=#003399><SPAN id=lw_1185473932_0><SPAN id=lw_1185628223_0 style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%">http://www.geolang.com/draftGAListRulesV3.htm</SPAN></SPAN></FONT></SPAN></A><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Eric</DIV>
<DIV>as GA Chair</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<P></P>Regards,<BR>Jeffrey A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp; Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very<BR>often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll Towing&nbsp; (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated 1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of<BR>Information Network Eng.&nbsp; INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827<BR></ZZZBODY></ZZZBODY></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>