<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Re: [RAA-WG] Starting the discussion
- To: raa-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [ga] Re: [RAA-WG] Starting the discussion
- From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:43:15 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=Xw2ojEJreNe1xITiNC9WWvTmr3RE9T2pNF2MsDPhpQItuSKwN/2z71B5JvuuAaIT; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Cc:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Debbie,
My point exactly. Most of us have other
work related responsibilities the preclude doing
research for other members/participants of the GA
or any other organization pro bono. I would think
this would be understood without saying. Guess I
was wrong about that. Hence why I suggested
the hiring of a research assistant/temp.
I would have also assumed, perhaps wrongly also,
that participation on this forum for RAA, a
certain level of knowledge base, background in
registry and registration function and operation
for TLD registries, and a knowledge in the
differences, however broadly, of differences in
standards and standards bodies, and a understanding
of the ICANN history of these RAA contracts as well
as assignment practice of registrars and TLD registries.
>From what I have read so far, I am sure I was wrong
about that to an extent.
-----Original Message-----
>From: Debbie Garside <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Jul 17, 2007 5:05 AM
>To: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, raa-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Cc: 'General Assembly of the DNSO' <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 'GNSO/DNSO' <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: [ga] Re: [RAA-WG] Starting the discussion
>
>Hi Jeff
>
>If nobody can provide the current RAA process documents and related policy
>documents I don't see how the RAA WG can progress. I do find it strange
>that a mailing list can be started and yet links to the documents under
>discussion are not provided.
>
>As to research, I have enough work to do without doing too much more
>voluntary work.
>
>Best
>
>Debbie
>
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Williams
>> Sent: 17 July 2007 07:11
>> To: Debbie Garside
>> Cc: 'icann board address'; 'icann staff'; General Assembly of
>> the DNSO; GNSO/DNSO
>> Subject: [ga] Re: [RAA-WG] Starting the discussion
>>
>> Debbie and all,
>>
>> What would be even more helpful is for those seeking help,
>> search the archives of this list forum and/or the ICANN web
>> site for themselves and after exhausting those searches and
>> still unable to find whatever they are looking for, before
>> asking others to do their "leg work" for them. The other
>> alternative is to hire a research assistant to perform such tasks.
>>
>> I don't believe Glen has the time to do this sort of
>> research for anyone either. Maybe a bottle of some very good
>> French perfume would entice here sufficiently to free up some
>> time to assist anyone in performing such a task. >:)
>>
>> I don't know right offhand at the moment if there is a
>> "Kelly Girls" temp service in GB but I do know such or
>> similar services are available in GB and are very reasonable
>> as to cost. Perhaps availing oneself of such a service would
>> achieve the assistance which one may require for doing such research.
>>
>> The ICANN web site is at: http://www.icann.org/ Archives for
>> this forum are at: http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/
>> Be aware there are had have been for some time now, missing
>> archives in the GNSO GA archive. I would humbly suggest
>> starting at year 2003 thru 2006 in regards to RAA related information.
>> Be advised the archive facility ICANN/GNSO uses is archaic as
>> there is no *comprehensive* key word search capability for
>> these archives. However I wrote a little executable scrip
>> that does the trick and have found very useful from time to time.
>> Happy searching! >:)
>>
>> Debbie Garside wrote:
>>
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > It would be useful if someone could provide a link to the
>> current RAA
>> > Accreditation Process and related policies in order that
>> they may be
>> > reviewed by this working group.
>> >
>> > Best regards
>> >
>> > Debbie
>> >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Jeff Williams [mailto:jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> > > Sent: 16 July 2007 10:28
>> > > To: raa-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > Cc: Danny Younger; icann board address; icann staff; Eric D/Hugh
>> > > Dierker; Debbie Garside
>> > > Subject: Re: [RAA-WG] Starting the discussion
>> > >
>> > > Danny and all,
>> > >
>> > > I agree with you again on this point, and nicely,
>> concisely and no
>> > > nonsensicly stated Danny. However I believe what Vittorio was
>> > > looking for is a statement that is a little more
>> politically correct
>> > > than what you earlier, provided. If so, I for one am sorry and a
>> > > bit indifferent to such a desire.
>> > >
>> > > Concise, direct, and in depth to the extent necessary is IMHO
>> > > always a better manner of communicating. Very refreshing! >:)
>> > > Thank you again Danny.
>> >
>>
Regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|