<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Increased foreign attendance
- To: <veni@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] Increased foreign attendance
- From: "Debbie Garside" <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 17:56:14 +0100
- Cc: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <4683e715.0e35640a.3dab.0073@mx.google.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ace5pK4ZFbrqMYsqRZSN6a1FIRzohgAAHLSw
Thanks Veni
I'm not known for giving up :-)
Best regards
Debbie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Veni Markovski [mailto:venimarkovski@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of veni markovski
> Sent: 28 June 2007 17:49
> To: Debbie Garside
> Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ga] Increased foreign attendance
>
> Dear Debbie,
> perhaps now you can see for yourself why people at this list
> are quite quiet - if someone like you makes any attempts to
> bring the discussion to the common sense, he or she will be
> blamed immediately as someone who either a) doesn't
> understand, or b) has no knowledge [of this long history].
>
> Now that I think about it, it reminds me very much of the
> Soviet propaganda from the 1970s. "The world imperialism",
> "the international situation", "progressive humankind" and
> such cliches were in the daily news, 365 days every year, and
> in intercalary years it was 366 days when i was hearing such spells.
>
> However, to end at a positive note - I think what you are
> writing makes more sense than many of the other cliches we
> see around ICANN.
> It's always good to hear someone new, unencumbered with this
> long history.
>
> Don't give up! And don't pay attention to the negativists.
>
> Best,
> Veni
>
> At 08:15 6/28/2007 -0700, sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > Hi Danny
> > >
> > > Thanks for the outline. I can, somewhat, understand your
> frustration.
> > > However as an observer I can perhaps see why, I have been
> subscribed
> > > to this list since December 2006 and from what I can see the
> > > majority of posts are highly critical of ICANN and not in any way
> > > constructive; it is the constructive aspect that is missing.
> >
> >Well, Debbie, here's some food for thought for you... those
> of us who
> >have been on these ICANN mailing lists since 1998 have seen our
> >constructive input completely ignored for 8 years before you came
> >along. Perhaps we're a little tired of being ignored? More
> than just a little frustrated...?
> >Perhaps we're tired of obsequious johnny-come-latelies of the "civil
> >society" sort showing up who know nothing of the history of
> ICANN and
> >telling us how to be constructive? Perhaps you should familiarize
> >yourself with ICANN history before you come out scolding those of us
> >who have been members of these mailing lists as well as
> original ICANN
> >At-Large Members for many years before you even knew there
> was an ICANN...
> >
> >SS
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|