Re: [ga] New Constituency

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

This is getting entirely too much support not to organize and move forward. Allow me to threaten you all. If I do not recieve 3 volunteers by sometime tommorrow I will lead the group.
   
  Eric

"Prophet Partners Inc." <Domains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  Hi Jeff,

All 3-letter domains in .com, .net, .org, .info and .biz are long gone. 
IUC.org has been registered since Jan 27,1999 and IRC.org has been 
registered since Sept 16, 1993. We either need to consider a 4-letter 
acronym for an available domain name or pony up the cash to buy the domain 
name we want from an existing registrant. IMO, there's no sense in pursuing 
incorporation or 501(C)3 status until we have a domain name.

Sincerely,
Ted
Prophet Partners Inc.
http://www.ProphetPartners.com
http://www.Premium-Domain-Names.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Williams" 
To: "Hugh Dierker" 
Cc: "ga" 
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 2:13 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] New Constituency


> Dr. Dierker and all,
>
> Interesting response with little beef. Where's the Beef, Dr. Dierker?
>
> I can only surmise that you decline my suggested starting point.
> However we must start somewhere, eh? Members will come
> if they have a place to come to, which was what I suggested
> below. I am sure others can do the outreach you indirectly
> suggest. I gather however from your response that actually
> starting and meeting the challenge which I pose, you are not
> in agreement with or cannot produce the legal work necessary.
> How unfortunate, another opportunity lost accordingly.
>
> How many more YEARS do you Dr. Dierker suggest we
> discuss "options" before actually taking action? 2? 5? 20?
>
> Hugh Dierker wrote:
>
>> Very interesting comments and concepts. We should keep many options
>> open. I am not convinced this is the most prudent way forward. Perhaps
>> you could lay out what you believe to be the best route forward,
>> including in some detail the steps to be taken down the road and the
>> approach you would use to gain membership.
>>
>> Thank you for your continued contributions and high energy.
>>
>> Eric
>>
>> Jeff Williams wrote:
>> Dr. Dierker and all,
>>
>> IUC.ORG seems like a good domain name for an Individual user
>> constituency, and my original IRC.ORG which as I recall Dr.Dierker
>> was in enthusiastic support of on this forum some 4 months ago, is
>> a good domain name for Individual Registrant Constituency. I will
>> be happy to register these Domain names if they are not already
>> taken IF our fearless leader, Dr. Eric Dierker will do the necessary
>> legal work for incorporating them in Delaware or California and
>> 501 C3's.
>>
>> What say you Dr. Dierker, and all? Or shall we punt and
>> keep on pitching bitches?
>>
>> Hugh Dierker wrote:
>>
>> > I believe that the GA would be well founded in commenting to the
>> > effect that new broad based constituencies be formed.
>> > It would appear that subsection 3.4 addresses this issue in relevant
>>
>> > part thusly;
>> > Preliminary recommendations
>> > Emerging recommendations regarding the constituency structure
>> > include;
>> > creating 3 or 4 broad based Stakeholder Groups..... ad nauseum.
>> >
>> >
>> http://www.icann.org/announcements/draft-wg-bgc-gnso-improvements-18jun07.pdf
>>
>> >
>> > There is room for more than one and membership parameters would be
>> > at issue.
>> > When we began our current organization of the GA it seemed apparent
>> > to me that the GA would help any movement to create an IDNO
>> > constituency. Personally I would rather see a broader based
>> Individual
>> > User constituency. In any event we should be ready to help in this
>> > endeavor. As I expressed earlier we should have a collective
>> position
>> > and stance.
>> >
>> > Eric
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Jeffrey A. Williams
>> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
>>
>> "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
>> Abraham Lincoln
>>
>> "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
>> very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
>>
>> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
>> liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
>> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
>> United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
>> ===============================================================
>> Updated 1/26/04
>> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
>> IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
>> ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
>> E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Registered Email addr with the USPS
>> Contact Number: 214-244-4827



       
---------------------------------
Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing.