<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] ICANN Ignores the Ombudsman
- To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>, Edward Hasbrouck <edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN Ignores the Ombudsman
- From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:17:26 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=MtajN3kt42np7XMKcVWIcCmkH3J2i41qSYuz4M5GFJrG4audvsDTeqjRnKuQb9kd; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3086" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<P>Dr. Dierker and all,</P>
<P> </P>
<P> Indeed. </P>
<DIV id=compText><BR><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Hugh Dierker <HDIERKER2204@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: May 24, 2007 3:58 PM <BR>To: Edward Hasbrouck <EDWARD@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <BR>Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN Ignores the Ombudsman <BR><BR>
<DIV>How pathetic and sad.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Eric<BR><BR><B><I>Edward Hasbrouck <edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">On 24 May 2007 at 12:04, "Danny Younger" <DANNY Younger <br><DANNYYOUNGER@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:<BR><BR>> Subject: [ga] ICANN Ignores the Ombudsman<BR><BR>Keep in mind that the person caliming to act as ICANN Ombudsman has never <BR>been properly appointed, as I have previously called to ICANN's attention:<BR><BR>http://forum.icann.org/lists/transparency-2007/msg00003.html<BR><BR>ICANN's Bylaws require that, "The Ombudsman shall be appointed by the <BR>Board for an initial term of two years, subject to renewal by the Board."<BR><BR>ICANN announced in November 2004 that an Ombudsman had been appointed. But <BR>there is no record in the publicly-disclosed minutes of meetings of the <BR>Board of Directors that such an appointment was ever made by the Board. <BR>And more than two years have passed, with no record of any decision to <BR>renew any such appointment. <BR><BR>Since most Board meetings are secret, and some minutes have never been <BR>published, it's impossible for the public to tell if the Board secretly <BR>appointed and/or renewed the apointment of an Ombudsman (in violation of <BR>the transparency Bylaw), or if an Ombudsman was appointed by some entity <BR>other than the Board (in violation of the Ombudsman Bylaw). But it's clear <BR>from even cursory comparison of the Bylaws with ICANN's public records <BR>that the person acting as Ombudsman has not been properly appointed, and <BR>that one or the other Bylaw has been violated.<BR><BR>The person acting as Ombudsman has committed such grave breaches of <BR>professional ethics and the Bylaws that they would clearly be unfit for <BR>the position, even if they were now proposed for appointment by the Board. <BR>In my case, the person acting as Ombudsman intervened -- successfully -- <BR>to block my access to the reconsideration process on a different issue, <BR>even though he knew or reasonably should have known that it would be a <BR>violation of ICANN's Bylaws for his opinions to be used as a basis for <BR>that action by the Reconsideration Committee:<BR><BR>http://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/001196.html<BR><BR><BR>----------------<BR>Edward Hasbrouck<BR><EDWARD@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR><HTTP: hasbrouck.org><BR>+1-415-824-0214<BR><BR><BR>
<P>Regards,<BR><BR>Jeffrey A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -<BR> Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very<BR>often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated 1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of<BR>Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827<BR><ZZZ!-- --></P></ZZZBODY></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BODY>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|