<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] RAA,/ Escrowing data
- To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] RAA,/ Escrowing data
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 07:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=hlNmx3RnkGw3xFh12IDTZf3cTj6fKEXUZNVy0x/VFPtQ/i3AXLkv0a5cZRLtkFcpQ/2yhslza/sE2YifJKote1f2My7DjZbXwaJF2+ShrfQ25reoCEVs80B2rKa/zTy/+YBFLkM4dpikdqV0v2cUZznSVeVJp7rkFu7/fIFoaMk=;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A general questions;
Is this discussion regarding the escrowing of data within the scope of a WG on the RAA?
Are some of the consequences of the current Whois WG work going to require a revisit to the RAA to make them compliant?
I think the answers are in the affirmative.
Eric
---------------------------------
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|