Re: [ga] Escrowing Proxy Data instead of True Registrant Data

[JFC Morfin <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 01:12 19/05/2007, Karl Auerbach wrote:
> However, do we want a centrally designed system of uniform design 
> (one size fits all)?  Or do we want to allow flexibility.

The missa is said.

ccTLDs will never subscribe to such a system, nor national and open 
TLDs, nor keyword services, nor alias support services.
ICANN may want to include such a "value added" service in its 
package. This only is a credibility factor of the ICANN registry 
band. If some other consortium comes with another package they will 
compete (hopefully for better quality).

Everyone knows that ICANN has no way to make the root server system 
survive IDNs. Therefore all what is discussed about the DNS and the 
name space, must take into account the impact of the end of the root 
server system (what is not the end of the Master file, nor of the DNS 
influence). Otherwise ICANN will be unprepared and replaced by the 
grassroots process under way, instead of leading it with IETF as they should.

Their choice.
jfc