<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] At-Large
- To: GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] At-Large
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=1vpVZYAtHtmaUTL4Yp3oDBkTKG99yYff3qK7/IfbNSKlcL00eBQrGOy+1oWgLXFMdAaiKTMsQBPxlbnBBnLpovDjh+K0aV9KaNYxHT4Fr/0s0u6wXg+S/m0GVP6Cff/pffFGjudw/oYszwJ3lAZ6levre9W0uKPi1mjO6C8FNEc= ;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I do not see how we can avoid this issue - nor should we;
http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/msg00000.html
An independent review would be greatly enhanced if it had a position developed here on the GA. There are many qualified persons here to head up an AL WG. We note that the list of groups involved increased by three this meeting, with claims that this increases individual representation. However I saw no corresponding increase in representatives to the BoD.
Just food for thought.
Eric
---------------------------------
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|