Re: [ga] Re: net neutrality

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Kim and all,

  Only a very few are, or become standards in the RFC standards
track.  Even those that do are subject to change, such as the
one you referenced below, Kim.  And even in these very few
instances, they are still RFC's and as such are "Requests for
comments".

Kim Davies wrote:

> Quoting Jeff Williams on Monday March 26, 2007:
> |
> |   Again we must all bare in mind that RFC's are not standards,
> | but "Requests for comments".
>
> Some RFCs are standards. See
> ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3700.txt
>
> kim

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827