Re: [ga] 1 year or 6 months

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 07:32 a.m. 16/03/2007, Hugh Dierker wrote:
> Just to make it a one point post and for clarity.
>
> I would suggest and back the 6 month term for reasons stated.
>
> However I would join a majority if they want a 1 year - I suppose if it 
> was too much the chair could notify and resign. I just know that first 6 
> months is going to be rough and tumble.


For continuity, to prevent a floundering after 6 months, it would be a good 
idea if the vice chair (who would have a background role for most of the 6 
months) has 1 month more; then he has the authority to oversee fresh 
elections under ratified rules.

Again, are there any Board members or Names council members here who have 
the courage to utter support for a GA Chair election?

-joop-
www.pollingbooth.info