<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Riskiest?
- To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] Riskiest?
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=l+Y5uv7Hhi3yEkXgw+RaWKv9xagHEjQzI2Gzs5CrFDEmhPtWipKPBC4rjB5J4YX/ZTo8pJUuO65O+jL8mZomi1ZWiSOzE9BlElvUv93RTaDI4UTwlmCONBWzhTeSbe460kOOfC3g+oCYPWk4vxpfmFRlZ2X4Iu+xDtAQ3W3g8HQ= ;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This is an intriguing little article. I wonder how you would change the Latin "Caveat Emptor" to "website visitor beware", I think Caveat Salutator.
In any case (upper or lower) beware of visiting .Info sites.
Eric
http://www.spannerworks.com/seotoolkit/search-marketing-news/article/view/survey-reveals-riskiest-domain-names/413/
---------------------------------
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|