<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Registerfly & Data Escrow
Thanks for your input and participation Jon. We appreciate hearing from your constituency on matters like this.
Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
http://www.articlecontentprovider.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Nevett, Jonathon
To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 10:42 AM
Subject: FW: [ga] Registerfly & Data Escrow
<My question to you: Is the registrar community generally in compliance with data escrow provisions,
<or do we still have a major problem that remains unaddressed by ICANN's Compliance Staff?
Danny:
Let me field this one.
Just so we are on the same page, Section 3.6 of the RAA provides for the following:
"During the Term of this Agreement, on a schedule, under the terms, and in the format specified by ICANN, Registrar shall submit an electronic copy of the database . . . to ICANN or, at Registrar's election and at its expense, to a reputable escrow agent . . . ."
Every registrar currently is in technical compliance with this provision because ICANN has never implemented a schedule, terms, or a format of the escrow arrangement. Notwithstanding, reputable registrars have implemented escrow-type arrangements on their own in order to protect their customers.
Over the past year or so, ICANN has been discussing implementing the schedule, terms, and format for a registrar escrow arrangement. On behalf of Network Solutions, I provided comments on the draft in June 2006, but I believe only one other registrar provided comments. Hopefully, the RegisterFly situation is a wake-up call to ICANN and the registrar community to get together to implement an appropriate escrow arrangement. I also hope it is a wake-up call to the registrant community to be very careful in making purchasing decisions. Registrants should only buy registration services from reputable registrars.
Thanks.
Jon Nevett
Chair, ICANN Registrar Constituency
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|