<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Ombudsman Blog
- To: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Ombudsman Blog
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:23:05 -0800
- Cc: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>, ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, icann board address <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>, icann staff <icann-staff@xxxxxxxxx>, Kathy Smith <ksmith@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, james tierney <james.tierney@xxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <161991.21868.qm@web52212.mail.yahoo.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Danny and all,
The Ombudsman and Ombudsman Blog is only an exercise in
mental masturbation for registrant manipulation purposes, and
a "Touchy feely" good for DOC/NTIA.
It is my and many of our members opinion that DOC/NTIA
and DOJ should be looking out for registrants rather than
ICANN registries and registrars.
Eric, was this brief enough for your satisfaction? >;)
Danny Younger wrote:
> Eric,
>
> Enom recently dropped registerfly as a reseller citing
> several customer-service related issues (and of
> course, registerfly is now an accredited ICANN
> registrar).
>
> The problem with the Ombudsman's note is that here we
> have a large population of registrants with probably
> legitimate complaints that write in the hope of
> getting assistance with renewal and other issues, and
> instead they are being told by the Ombudsman "Sorry,
> that's not my job".
>
> Recent correspondence has indicated that ICANN
> received in excess of 10,000 complaints regarding
> registrars during 2006 -- see
> http://www.icann.org/correspondence/ruiz-to-twomey-09feb07.pdf
>
> It would be nice for those of us that take on policy
> development activities to understand the nature of
> these complaints.
>
> I recall ICANN stating that they had developed and
> implemented a ticketing system for the coordination of
> customer service inquiries, yet to date we have
> received no data from ICANN staff that categorizes the
> nature of the complaints received.
>
> Clearly this makes policy work much more difficult.
>
> Will ICANN Staff ever provide the GNSO with an
> overview of complaints against registrars? One can
> only hope that this will happen as there is no
> registrants constituency within the GNSO to progress
> the issue.
>
> --- Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > This is good for transparency. I had no idea that
> > regsisterfly was so important to so many.
> >
> > http://omblog.icann.org/
> >
> > Eric
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people
> > who know. Ask your question on Yahoo! Answers.
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Never Miss an Email
> Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile. Get started!
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/services?promote=mail
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|