ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Weekly posting summary for ga@gnso.icann.org

  • To: Thomas Narten <narten@xxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Weekly posting summary for ga@gnso.icann.org
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 08:04:01 -0800 (PST)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=o31jYYVnMXAjrlYc5b5usIcagzXArE7xfXbgDzDdAB0Z2fZ6Jq3JOUDp2YSKi9gA77qs2MxyXdfYdxPEA7KdIDOGZcIHVayn4VAnYuSPcGtVVXCQB+t72Wn5zMxuAaV9fWFJk6kdGziMn0DHyi4GhvLGMenn7oxV7QFOEy1sbLk=;
  • In-reply-to: <200702021350.l12DoQdl028497@cichlid>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I think this is really good to have.  Can you do it on the actually volume or size of comment?  I really believe this would be more helpful. In developing societies and for those who are constrained by bandwidth the shear size of a post is more telling than the amount of posts. 
   
  Also we probably learn more from some of the longer posts and if there be credit for contribution it should rest there.
   
  Lastly many posts come from "me toos". Short posts that exclaim an agreement with what was stated. While these have no place in technical scientific debate they are most helpful for societal consensus building.
   
  However if none of the above can be quantified and/or qualified i still think the mere counting and the posting of results is helpful.
   
  Eric

Thomas Narten <narten@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  [note: I've started collecting stats on numbers of posts to this list
and will post them on a weekly basis. It has proven interesting to
display such stats on other mailing lists I'm on. YMMV.

The script I use can be found at
http://www.hactrn.net/hacks/mh-list-traffic/mh-list-traffic.]

Total of 109 messages in the last 7 days.

script run at: Fri Feb 2 00:53:02 EST 2007

Messages | Bytes | Who
--------+------+--------+----------+------------------------
24.77% | 27 | 21.83% | 190035 | jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
17.43% | 19 | 25.32% | 220387 | hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx
11.01% | 12 | 12.85% | 111839 | kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
10.09% | 11 | 12.48% | 108598 | roberto@xxxxxxxxx
10.09% | 11 | 6.88% | 59854 | dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx
4.59% | 5 | 7.32% | 63710 | jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
5.50% | 6 | 3.31% | 28855 | bortzmeyer@xxxxxx
4.59% | 5 | 3.28% | 28524 | karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx
4.59% | 5 | 2.78% | 24190 | elisabeth.porteneuve@xxxxxxxxxxxx
1.83% | 2 | 1.07% | 9295 | terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
1.83% | 2 | 0.82% | 7164 | andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
0.92% | 1 | 0.56% | 4868 | cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx
0.92% | 1 | 0.55% | 4810 | kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
0.92% | 1 | 0.52% | 4557 | gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx
0.92% | 1 | 0.43% | 3775 | gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--------+------+--------+----------+------------------------
100.00% | 109 |100.00% | 870461 | Total


 
---------------------------------
Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
 
---------------------------------
Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on Yahoo! Answers.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>