<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] RE: is ICANN or is ICANN not?
- To: "Elisabeth Porteneuve" <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] RE: is ICANN or is ICANN not?
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:30:19 -0500
- Cc: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <200701312205.XAA16432@balsa.cetp.ipsl.fr>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcdFhwQZlDZvo614TMqX4YRDsISyiwACHhFg
- Thread-topic: [ga] RE: is ICANN or is ICANN not?
Elisabeth,
If ICANN is providing a useful service with appropriate community input,
does it really matter who gave ICANN the mandate or authority?
Chuck Gomes
P.S. - Always good to see you active again.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Elisabeth Porteneuve
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 5:06 PM
To: roberto@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ga] RE: is ICANN or is ICANN not?
Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> >
> > I do hope that ICANN learned the lesson as well.
> >
> It did, I can assure you.
> That's also why it is now looking for community input on TLD sunset,
> before taking action on .su.
Roberto, who gave ICANN a mandate for allocating or retiring ccTLD
names?
Or to take action on .SU?
Or just any other ccTLD for that matter?
Who autorised ICANN to make policy regarding ccTLDs?
Is that within IANA contract?
Best regards,
Elisabeth Porteneuve
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|