<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] ITU and ICANN
- To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] ITU and ICANN
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:30:01 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Fj4pKtgbx8Wp3K26uUdma1kemUtPsNXI6RyYuhKVqq+rhqQC1YpmenklJFsa8BpYozptvDc0iC4MMYb91ltmwRPc8p6KNReuTsb3eM60KEbr9Pp4OJHhQ7+C4SkNtME5Gd4gXCYb0l4WvSmMrETF7tGFCyNpjpKqmJSE4gtrqak= ;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
After reading this interview article I was relieved to learn the the ITU would not take over the duties of ICANN. And then I scratched my head and wondered why the ITU could think that they could take over ICANN.
http://www.revenuesource.com/internet-marketing-articles/10198-un-will-not-control-internet.html
e
---------------------------------
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|