<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Whois more in detail
- To: "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] Whois more in detail
- From: "Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:03:06 +0100
- Cc: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcczTahXeERO1nsnTdiJjaQxesCoPQAADKrw
- Thread-topic: [ga] Whois more in detail
Absolutely, Chris. In my opinion, reporting whois-noncompliant links is
an essential part of the whois policy. This question will come forth
anyway regardless of the whois model eventually chosen.
Dominik
-----Original Message-----
From: kidsearch [mailto:kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 6:51 PM
To: Dominik Filipp; ga
Subject: Re: [ga] Whois more in detail
I see that as completely doable Dominik and appreciate the time you
spent on that. One question is would it be enforceable? I mean say I
registered a domain nameand said i was a nonprofit or noncomm, but then
built a commercial website anyway. There could be a link in the whois,
"report this website as noncompliant with whois rules" where users can
report that it is a commercial website and not a noncomm.
Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
http://www.articlecontentprovider.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
To: "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 7:49 AM
Subject: [ga] Whois more in detail
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|