<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] scammers using whois privacy
- To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] scammers using whois privacy
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 16:05:04 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=KRmo8u/WOdihDfZCS2PStxEoW2eSdecngA8Sh823MTiWRxqxRKPbzsD/lk4PW33wbXGXLT3sIWPZBmrM6DQGLhJeGytQl+YlPkxVv8cNJ8+YcqgWvvsxqgiouyf+mo0wMWtnIr8xqkcYGNVg2o4XK6IrO5FDbWiF5dd9bysA+zo=;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I used to have a hand in "mass marketing" utilizing "leads" sold by those with "privacy" policies. The registrant may only pay $20 and his info to register. That info lead can be sold 100 times for $10 a pop. Hence scammers and spammers are the same.
It takes no genuis to figure out that the info from a registration is worth hundreds more that the hook-up with the name.
With that in mind; what was the argument all about?
e
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|