Re: [ga] ICANN Board unanimously approves .biz/.info/.org registry agreements by 13-0

["kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Veni, sorry to select you out of the group, but one compliment I'll give you 
is that I knew by selecting you, at least there would be a response. So take 
it as a compliment.

Public good, bottom-up consensus, words that so far ICANN's BoD and staff 
have shown disdain for. The comments on those agreements were about 90% 
negative. ICANN, by unanimous vote decided that it does not matter what 
users think.

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
http://www.articlecontentprovider.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Veni Markovski" <veni@xxxxxxxx>
To: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Prophet Partners Inc." 
<Domains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN Board unanimously approves .biz/.info/.org registry 
agreements by 13-0


> At 02:18 PM 08.12.2006 '?.'  -0500, kidsearch wrote:
> > I have to agree. But it is not unexpected. The ICANN Board has absolutley 
> > no regard for the public wishes or benefit. Yes, Veni, since the vote was 
> > unanimous, obviously you are included in that.
>
> It's good you mention that. It also makes a lot of sense to see who of the 
> directors / former directors reads the least ;), and you know that.
>
> However, now that I am not on the Board, I am more free to talk, too. 
> There have always been people bashing ICANN for one or another decision. 
> Can you define what you mean by "public wishes or benefit"? Is the GA list 
> representing the "public wishes or benefit"? Or it's the GNSO council? Or 
> someone else?
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Veni Markovski
> http://www.veni.com
>
> check also my blog:
> http://blog.veni.com