ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Can not submit comments to whois report - submission email address is invalid

  • To: Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Can not submit comments to whois report - submission email address is invalid
  • From: George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:31:53 -0800 (PST)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Qps9mAQvkYfLPNGXQ8Wmj6IE5ThMOMj9Yyqbpg41oVdEV6Ejx4npKCjpiv2KlwhTWiBFL7i36xuPRvB6wMeyr7vgH7ASO9UW4DmY1ZhUpREbfUmwQcWp2gqjQ74/uyoH+lAJgQ/vJDsc8s6HSDNItWSiL6Pe9xz+RiYjK4oHsZ8=;
  • In-reply-to: <4568A395.6040507@cavebear.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Karl,

--- Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ICANN, as usual, displays a negative degree of technical competence.
> 
> I tried (twice) to submit a comment to its new whois report (see 
> http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-24nov06.htm) but the 
> submission e-mail address does not work.
> 
> Sheesh.

This has happened so many times before, and of course with no
consequence to the staff who are responsible. e.g.

http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga/msg04186.html
http://blog.lextext.com/blog/_archives/2006/5/24/1982288.html

The lower staff simply follow the lead of those higher-ranking
incompetent staff who "negotiate" registry contracts for .com or
.biz/info/org that are repeatedly found wanting. ICANN's culture seems
to be the opposite of a meritocracy --- the greater the incompetence,
the better the chances to be promoted.

We need tabula rasa. 

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
http://www.kirikos.com/
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>