Re: [ga] Responses by .biz/info/org Registry Operators are Unacceptable

["kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That works for me as well, Jeff.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Karl Auerbach"
<karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "George Kirikos" <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>;
<ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <org-tld-agreement@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 12:20 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] Responses by .biz/info/org Registry Operators are
Unacceptable


> Chuck and all,
>
>   Easy to answer.  From a REAL ICANN membership and donations.
>
> Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
> > Chris,
> >
> > Where do you think funding of the application process costs should come
> > from if not from the applicant?
> >
> > Chuck Gomes
> > VeriSign Information Services
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of kidsearch
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 9:11 AM
> > > To: Karl Auerbach
> > > Cc: George Kirikos; ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; org-tld-agreement@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [ga] Responses by .biz/info/org Registry
> > > Operators are Unacceptable
> > >
> > > Then we definitely agree. The only reason I suggest ICANN be
> > > involved in
> > > this one is that I don't believe a $50,000 registration fee should be
> > > charged for someone wishing to create a public benefit TLD. I
> > > wish ICANN to
> > > waive this fee and make concessions for the creation of dot
> > > NGO or NPO which
> > > should be a restricted TLD and go to an operator that is a
> > > public benefit
> > > org.
> > >
> > > Not my org for those wondering if I have an agenda. I don't
> > > wish to run it.
> > > I just want there to be a legitimate nonprofit TLD and wish there was
> > > representation for public benefit nonprofits within the ICANN
> > > supporting
> > > structure.
> > >
> > > Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Karl Auerbach" <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: "George Kirikos" <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> > > <org-tld-agreement@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 3:11 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [ga] Responses by .biz/info/org Registry Operators are
> > > Unacceptable
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I think I must have failed to fully express what I wanted to say.
> > > >
> > > > It's my feeling that any "meaning" that is associated with
> > > a TLD is the
> > > > business of the users and operator of that TLD, not the
> > > business of ICANN.
> > > >
> > > > So if you (.ewe?) or I (.eye?) want to start up a TLD and
> > > say that it is
> > > > for people who want to set up a mesh of brain wave transfer servers,
> > > > then that's for us to say.
> > > >
> > > > But it's not ICANN's role to sit up there on its throne,
> > > looking down
> > > > onto the internet and say "Let there be a TLD named .dog
> > > for websites
> > > > with content for dyxlexics".
> > > >
> > > > ICANN's proper role is merely to inquire whether an
> > > operator, potential
> > > > or real, is adhering to widely accepted, published internet
> > > *technical*
> > > > standards.  And for that they merely need a simple one page
> > > checklist,
> > > > and a very small ($50?) application fee to cover costs (assuming a
> > > > proper sized ICANN rather than the bloated money pit that
> > > it has become.)
> > > >
> > > > --karl--
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > > Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.5/483 - Release
> > > Date: 10/18/06
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
> "Obediance of the law is the greatest freedom" -
>    Abraham Lincoln
>
> "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
> very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
>
> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> ===============================================================
> Updated 1/26/04
> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
> IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
> ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
> E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  Registered Email addr with the USPS
> Contact Number: 214-244-4827
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.7/488 - Release Date: 10/19/06
>
>