<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] No more FUD -- what is the current size of the .com database?
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] No more FUD -- what is the current size of the .com database?
- From: George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=CYubCG4rAUGm8IAXsFGKIktuYmpCei57Vch/rggOzzBnooFP79WhLMDfaAOnqJ58Rg+X8DV0N1jvaO1by8fd7vGtP6yVbq1W4uhWhJHERRibLPdfiyknneSH5W95OZggW234x7+KKjnPFffSTcpZx8TItpWLKFE7ygwi4n+C7Wc= ;
- In-reply-to: <45183AE0.2080300@cavebear.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,
--- Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The .com zone has on the order of 60,000,000 names, which means we
> are
> talking about a 12 gigabyte zone file, uncompressed.
>
> One does have to give credit to Verisign for coming up with systems
> to
> distribute the updates to this every 5 minutes (although one might
> suspect that such incremental updates became a necessity as the size
> of
> the file made bulk updates difficult.)
I don't think it's particularly impressive that they can distribute
updates every 5 minutes. If we give an upper estimate that 1% of domain
names have nameserver changes daily, then 1% of 12 GB is 120 MB. 120 MB
distributed throughout a 24 hour day might mean a "peak" change of
several MBs in any 5 minute interval (i.e. one only sends the
differences, via incremental updates).
Ken Silva was talking about how VeriSign must use "specialized"
systems, and thus need price increases. Yet:
http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3590911
http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3547786
Under $10,000 each.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos
http://www.kirikos.com/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|