ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Fwd: Re: netiquette

  • To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [ga] Fwd: Re: netiquette
  • From: Veni Markovski <veni@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:06:57 -0400
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

btw, here's a good example of how some of the people prefer to work here.
Let's examine the message below.

First, note that I've changed the subject. Second, note that suddenly there's a new CC: - the icann-board. Third - see that the discussion is that I have not changed the subject.

And of course, the "insinuation, falsificatoins and manipulations" (to use an old cliche, very suitable in this case) that no ICANN Board member has ever admit they are wrong....

I think this is enough to prove my being correct in what I wrote earlier today.

Karl, we can continue our conversation off-list.

Best,
Veni


From: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
        "Veni Markovski" <veni@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: "icann board address" <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: netiquette
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:22:15 -0400
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409

Never said it didn't matter so don't assume what matters to me Veni. You
were preaching netiquette and talking about others posting off topic yet you
are posting offtopic and not practicing netiquette by creating a new thread
so as not to distract from the topic of this one.

But then for any ICANN board member to admit they are wrong on even the
smallest point is totally impossible.


----- Original Message ----- From: "Veni Markovski" <veni@xxxxxxxx> To: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Veni Markovski" <veni@xxxxxxxx> Cc: "icann board address" <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:29 PM Subject: netiquette


> At 11:47 AM 03.8.2006 '?.' -0400, kidsearch wrote: > >Veni said "let's try to stay focus on the problem with Danny using > >private e-mails in public communications." > >Yes, that is a much more important issue than ICANN > > ... etc. > It may not be more important, but for sure when someone is misuing > private e-mails, and does it more than once, I don't think a normal > user should stay quiet and watch peacefully. > For you it probably doesn't matter - if someone's words are being > used in an area where he or she does not have access. For me it matters. > > veni > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/406 - Release Date: 8/2/06 > >




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>