ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] The Report: GNSO PDP on the introduction of new TLDs

  • To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [ga] The Report: GNSO PDP on the introduction of new TLDs
  • From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=1clrkDK8AVfIKQkKgvIYGqH9WMofvkf5Yvxl39M0orbRd19fYav8hlZHG78dUvsQ2+8tyIo4fzLau8VZlZNM1xjuMzX0FI2Q77JxXR5KOaTwjZ5t5oVUgeXWTX7h/omN8PbUpYUbPDS+dnOMTxaSHeZ5JCrevjLRAk7k5/TRarU= ;
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The final draft of the Initial Report of the GNSO PDP
on the introduction of new TLDs has been posted: 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gtld-council/msg00172.html

The document makes statements such as:  "Discussion of
stability issues also showed that the ongoing use of
ICANN accredited registrars as sole retailers of gTLD
domains was desirable." 

To me, this view (put forward only by Ross Rader at
the Washington session) smacks of "restraint of
trade".  The Public Comment period will soon begin.  I
look forward to your views and analysis of this document.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>