<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Finally
- To: Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Finally
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 21:05:45 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=NjPphQh/eI/oweVHt4gFhhdUmvQWMTL5FCUh+Yp48iWZANdNtnb5bCo5x3rqTg007GLOSEZW9u1PbaBpQL2SegatCBdoLgEqY4SNdYBUma+rKCL1N20L2Osk6JJR2wZXFU4c2L7h2DqSYRvUGUNAwawb6BM7F3gsrpRShK6x3zQ= ;
- In-reply-to: <1CA24A5C-18F2-456D-8615-061E08E34F4F@navigator.co.nz>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Probably irrelevant. because Verisign in also a registrar. And don't we have over ten registries now.
But i do appreciate your point.
e
Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Verisign isn't a Registrar, they're a Registry.
On Mar 14, 2006, at 6:15 PM, Hugh Dierker wrote:
> Appropriate legal action is be funded and pursued.
>
> http://www.betanews.com/article/GoDaddy_Petitions_to_Block_com_Deal/
> 1142267540
>
> I do ask this one question? If Verisign gets to raise thier prices
> per proposed agreement, can't every other registrar?
> Discrimination? etc etc.
>
> e
>
> Yahoo! Mail
> Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|