ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: [governance] Establishment of the European Regional At-Large Organizaton

  • To: Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Re: [governance] Establishment of the European Regional At-Large Organizaton
  • From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:30:45 -0800 (PST)
  • Cc: governance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=3YrFFdCaSUuX1T4bD6GYNa86Vt7lri005A3aMIUYH+rEKUAfaouVuxmuR9ejp29eZdq6UM2qhmxH77oTmHtPdNW02P6Md5A4aXjYHuIVVVuuIBiZKj9zFJiiHlJNADDe8sKkdzNdXABmLt96sSgapO1NP8uVL845sdRPxuihQbA= ;
  • In-reply-to: <43D27304.6010707@bertola.eu.org>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Vittorio,

Frankly, your interest is in continuing to promote a
construct that replaces a host of At-Large directors
with a single non-elected liaison to the ICANN Board. 
Your agenda, and those of many of your associates on
the ALAC, calls for taking advantage of
ICANN-sponsored travel perks while refusing to have
your Committee discuss critical at-large matters (such
as representation) with the balance of the at-large
community that stand in fierce opposition to your
initiatives.

Your option was to support the conclusions of the
At-Large Study Committee that called for the
establishment of a Supporting Organization for the
At-Large and which called for seating five At-Large
directors on the Board.  Instead, you elected to
support a set of bylaws written by those that had just
expelled the At-Large directors in a Palace Coup
d'Etat.

You don't represent the At-Large.  You actions serve
to continue thwarting our right as the largest
stakeholder group to Board-level representation. 

best regards,
Danny

--- Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Danny Younger ha scritto:
> > You have chosen to acquiesce to capture because it
> > serves your interests -- sorry, but I find this to
> be
> > repugnant. 
> 
> Could you please specify
> 1) which "interests" I would have, that would be
> served by the present 
> situation, and,
> 2) how did I "acquiesce to capture", and what could
> I have done instead?
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a]
> bertola.eu.org]<-----
> http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>