<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Registrar Proposal
- To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Registrar Proposal
- From: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:57:43 -0500
- References: <20060118184553.51679.qmail@web53512.mail.yahoo.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Personal opinion, I don't like that condition much. It's one of the ways to
see if someone I might want to deal with is legitimate.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 1:45 PM
Subject: [ga] Registrar Proposal
> Rationalizing the gTLD Whois System and Specific
> Contact Records: Proposal to Increase Whois Utility
> and Relevancy: The
> Operational Point of Contact
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/registrars/msg03765.html
>
> Ross Rader has posted an update to a pending registrar
> proposal:
>
> This version of the proposal contains two changes.
>
> 1) the requirement for registries and registrars to
> display the creation date of a registration has been
> removed. Comments received at the ICANN Vancouver
> meeting indicated that the display of this data was
> inconsistent with the other data fields displayed.
>
> 2) a statement of scope was added.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|