Re: [ga] Auctions

["kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Why does the answer seem so simple to me? Again, let those who want to
create a tld, simply register it with ICANN.

If it isn't already taken, if they have the technical capability to mange
the tld, and they have the desire to market that tld, then let them do so.

Similar to the registering of a domain name, except on a higher level, with
the added technical requirements. ICANN would be sort of an uber-registry
for tlds.

It would be ludicrous for a domain name restrar like go daddy or enom to ask
you for a business plan, or a non-refundable application fee, before
allowing you to register a domain name. It would be ridiculous for a
registrar to have "rounds" of domain name releases of names "they chose" in
advance.

Okay, this month, go daddy will be allocating cheaperwebhosting.com,
doggrommingmadeeasy.net, and virtualinternetwebnetwork.net. We will be
taking applications and public comment during the month of february. We will
then spend another month reviewing the applicants business plans to decide
who we will allocate the domain name to. If you are not approved to manage
the domain name you apply for, your application fee will be held by go daddy
until further notice.

Some people will say that is not a good analogy, but it is a perfect
analogy. Here is why. If info.com was still available and I registered it. I
could then start selling subdomains like car.info.com, computer.info.com,
icann.info.com or any other subdomain someone wished to purchase from me.
The subdomain is one dot removed from the domain name the same as the domain
name is one dot removed from the tld.

There is no longer any reason to believe ICANN is doing anything other than
restricting free enterprise and free trade by not opening up the market for
tlds. It is no longer acceptable that ICANN should be the one to decide
which tlds will or will not be created nor is it acceptable that ICANN gets
to choose who can or cannot run a tld.

Do you present a businesss plan to the city you live in before they allow
you a business license? No. Does the city ask you to prove you are
financially stable before issuing you a business license? No, as long as you
pay the registration fee. If you apply for a business license to open a
clothing store, does the city ask how you will run your clothing store or if
you have the necessary expertise to run a clothing store? No. Does the city
think you will hurt them economically if your clothing store goes out of
business? No, it's none of their business. Is the city concerned that there
may not enough demand for yet another clothing store? No, again none of
their business.

ICANN not allowing me, or anyone else in the world, to create a tld of our
choice in any language we choose, is a blatant violation of our rights. In
many countries, America among them, the right to free enterprise still
exists. ICANN is denying me that right as an American citizen and doing so
when even their own organization exists under American law.

There are no needs for auctions or rounds or anything else. If you want to
run a tld, then you register it and start selling domain names. If you fail,
you fail, just as in any other business venture you take on. Artificially
restricting namespace to make a few business IP interests happy has to stop.

Chris McElroy
http://www.newsandmediablog.com




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Karl Auerbach" <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 3:11 PM
Subject: [ga] Auctions


> Re:  "Even during my term there were those who were
> absolutely, totally, and utterly against auctions, and
> some of those are still on the board."
>
> Karl,
>
> While we have heard the arguments in favor of auctions
> (Manheim, Solum, Mueller, yourself, etc.), we have
> frankly not yet considered the opposing points of
> view... in part because those privately-held views
> haven't been made public.
>
> For the sake of parity, I am therefore posting the
> Cross-Constituency view (BC-IPC-ISPCP) that opposes
> auctions (you may note that I don't agree with their
> position but I am posting it for the sake of
> discussion).  This is an excerpt from Philip
> Sheppard's White Paper on internet domain name
> expansion (June 2005):
>
>
> "5. The problem with an auction model for new domain
> names
>
> Sell to the highest bidder and hope that they have it
> right
>
> ICANN has indicated it may experiment with an auction
> model for the allocation of new domain names. This
> follows a suggestion aired though not justified in a
> 2004 paper from the OECD telecoms working party
> (bibliography reference 14). The paper compared an
> auction model to the laissez-faire model but
> regrettably did not address the quality benefits
> inherent in the added-value sponsored gTLD model.
>
> On the surface an auction model is more desirable than
> a 100% laissez-faire approach as the market would
> decide by price on the viability of success. But the
> approach has several drawbacks:
>
> "X Not so market-driven. An auction model may rely on
> a third party to dream up the names to auction. Who
> will that be? ICANN? Who says these will be the right
> names?
>
> "X Introduces bias. A work-around would be to allow
> the names to be proposed by the first prospective
> registry and then allow others to bid. But in such a
> case the latter bidders would always be at a
> disadvantage with respect to preparedness and their
> ability to assess the upper limit on a viable auction
> bid.
>
> "X Still no added value. Without the principles of
> differentiation, certainty and good faith, an auction
> model has no inherent ability to add value in the
> public interest.
>
> "X Market distortion from market hype. As the global
> bids for third generation mobile telephony have shown,
> even experienced companies may be tempted to grossly
> overbid in an auction model. The Internet has had its
> share of hype and will continue to do so. The prospect
> of the ¡§winner¡¦s curse¡¨ is real.
>
> "X Potential to be anti-competitive. An auction model
> has the potential to favour the existing dominant
> players. Given the current failure of competition at
> the registry level (84% market share by one company)
> this is not the model to use today.
>
> Summary
> In short, any supposed benefit from an auction model
> for new domain names has a disproportionate cost due
> to the increased likelihood of market distortions.
>
> Such an approach is contrary to the public interest
> and therefore contrary to ICANN¡¦s core values."
> http://www.bizconst.org/positions/WPnewgTLDsfinal.doc
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com