<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] More on localized tlds
- To: Paul Stahura <stahura@xxxxxxxx>, Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] More on localized tlds
- From: George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:01:38 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=31iNjTkc8vPeZrI9U77hpberbRIbIjpPGKBMaKaF4mw0eKtOEvJOJcXJ8z+Ky67erxYpu+lLrbF9I5SsaiHogk/VVN6ud4MkYeOMS44YE3iKtEy7jB0N+sXVr7HSWO73XQWWXZji+EGG7E9yhy3iEiT+bX5T2t4G1ogPyHC7JyM= ;
- In-reply-to: <0584E286D9C3C045B61DAB692193170B055ACE34@yew2.wou3.local>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi guys,
--- Paul Stahura <stahura@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Karl, I think you are correct ("out of date") regarding digits in
> SLDs
> but not in TLDs.
>
> I'm not sure where the very latest rfc is either, but
I believe RFC 1101 might be the one you're looking for? (it made
"3com.com" and "3m.com" legal)
See: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1101.txt
Sincerely,
George Kirikos
http://www.kirikos.com/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|