Re: [ga] Policy for dealing with controversial TLDs

["kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Again, I sincerely appreciate you monitoring me. I'm sure it's for my own good.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: RBHauptman@xxxxxxx 
  To: kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 2:02 PM
  Subject: Re: [ga] Policy for dealing with controversial TLDs


  Kidsearch, I just received 10 email messages from you today.  Do you have OCD?

  kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
    I'm all for a free market. Thats why I say if a company wants a tld, let them start one. Nothing wrong with a free market. Currently what we have is nowhere near one.

    Chris McElroy
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: RBHauptman@xxxxxxx 
      To: sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      Cc: terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx ; ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2005 7:44 AM
      Subject: Re: [ga] Policy for dealing with controversial TLDs


      that the "free" market produced the robber barons (and other similar scoundrels) is another example of why the "free" market stinks.  

      (I can see the flurry of emails defending these ill-begotten scoundrels. let 'em fly gentlemen let 'em fly..... )

      sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
        I wrote:
        > I believe many people have an interesting conception of what a free market
        > may be, few have a true understanding of it.  What I have been hearing
        > over the past several years from many people on this list is the
        > equivalent of the besmirching of the so-called "robber barons" in what
        > many 'capitalists' point to as the Golden Age of the free market system.
        > Carnegie and the rest had their detractors in their day too.

        Here's an excerpt from an interesting article at
        http://www.city-journal.org/html/5_1_a2.html:

        "In an age bereft of political heroes, the entrepreneurs who forged
        America's industrial economy served as role models for the nation's young.

        The best of them exemplified virtues long treasured by Americans: vision,
        energy, perseverance, hard work, and character. Even though most started
        near the top, enough outsiders, like Gould, Carnegie, and Vanderbilt,
        climbed the slippery ladder of success to preserve the American dream that
        anyone could do so.

        But still these businessmen were vilified, at bottom perhaps because they
        did their work too well. So brilliantly did they exploit the open system
        to amass wealth and power that they forced radical changes in the rules by
        their excesses, even as they forged an industrial system that produced
        quality goods on a colossal scale at prices that declined steadily for
        more than 30 years.

        E. H. Harriman, who by the time of his death in 1909 controlled more
        railroad mileage than anyone else and had brought the industry into a new
        era based on long hauls of large volumes at low rates, pronounced the most
        clear-sighted judgment on himself and his fellow Robber Barons. During an
        interview, he startled a reporter by pulling out a sheet filled with data
        on improvements to the Union Pacific Railroad. "As he read from it," the
        reporter later recalled, "I realized it was the apologia pro vita sua."

        "But the public assails and attacks you," said the reporter when Harriman
        had finished, "and impugns your motives and accuses you of all sorts of
        things. Doesn't the thanklessness of the job ever embitter you?"

        Harriman responded by slapping the sheet of statistics with his hand.

        "That," he said defiantly, remains."

        Ho, ho, ho! :-o

        Sotiris Sotiropoulos