<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] DOT BERLIN -- It's a problem...
- To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] DOT BERLIN -- It's a problem...
- From: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:46:14 -0500
- References: <20051223223613.79778.qmail@web53504.mail.yahoo.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
So, then Paris, TX could get the .paris domain.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 5:36 PM
Subject: [ga] DOT BERLIN -- It's a problem...
> I started thinking about the upcoming TLD application
> for .berlin
>
> There are those that will argue that instead of
> granting the sponsoring organization for this
> initiative a top level domain for Berlin, we should
> instead be insisting that Berlin rightly belongs on
> another level (as in berlin.de or berlin.eu or
> berlin.de.eu). If we accept this argument, then we
> are accepting a taxonomic approach which calls for
> geographic labels to abide by whatever hierarchy is
> set by a country code or regional code manager.
>
> The flip side of the argument might be to state that
> there is nothing inherently wrong with granting
> municipalities a top level domain. You can have
> .berlin, .nyc, .saigon, .moscow and thousands of other
> cities occupying space at the top level without
> occasioning any harm.
>
> The final decision that we make will set the pattern
> for the future. On what principles shall we base our
> selection criteria? We need a forward-going policy.
> What will it be?
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________
> Yahoo! DSL - Something to write home about.
> Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> dsl.yahoo.com
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|