<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: Vint: on the basic rationale for adding TLDs and any contra-indications
- To: "M. Morfin" <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Vint: on the basic rationale for adding TLDs and any contra-indications
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:08:58 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=v04a6EUt1urIDCWy1Q9rIgDg0vg2XZrFRvV+Bi9zuD/YslpN+uev25eG15vLIaxSLu1R5rqygGAOkC2RiYqlxiC1upb7r39yhoptzELnZDSXnm1uoULQdxndFgm7K7ZrTRoPSjoUHEqwF6tL/AJfwNuc/rUN23Iv4VONpH9EcW4= ;
- In-reply-to: <6.2.3.4.2.20051219231129.042bed30@mail.club-internet.fr>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Somegody is playing diplomacy here and me thinks I smell a rat.
e
"M. Morfin" <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi! SB,
I am glad you roughly agree with my computation, evaluation and critics.
And I found amusing your hint at a risk confinement system with
built-in self-violation.
At 09:46 19/12/2005, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>So, this "mirroring" proposal completely misses the point and plays
>with words.
This is why I quoted it as demonstration per absurdo of the debate over who ...
>controls and edits the root,
Instead of considering how one locally build it.
But I know, I am no expert and not technical, just user QA.
jfc
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|