<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] A TLD for Trademarks
- To: sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] A TLD for Trademarks
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:19:55 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=f7g7/cu9DQxY91fSWA5z2G+SeWWF7prFqLkYDULsiU6Mv5pdj9e8ieIqNts5WlnJp6CLto72llnos61tcaezGtzO5t7+alZLljxJ/trhA3U/9mHAwktyYxOSGOwR8A2HTc/mRl2UQw7yX5qOD6+1WkVXlFBSqHV2giYXOjO2gzY= ;
- In-reply-to: <1200.65.92.123.166.1134775682.squirrel@mail.hermesnetwork.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sorry dude but you make no sense here.
If your man Mr. Frederic Wallenberg tabled the motion he is your hero, if indeed you believe "Such an idea is completely irresponsible."
Please rectify your language.
e
sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> The main idea is to allow all legitimate trademark
> holders (under any legal regime) to secure their
> trademark as a second level domain. To facilitate this
> on a worldwide basis, it would be desirable to have
> one unique TLD for trademarks."
>
> http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~fredrik/courses/cyberlaw/A%20New%20DNS.pdf
Such an idea is completely irresponsible. By tabling such a proposition,
I understand Mr. Frederic Wallenberg as an enemy of innovation and
creativity NOT a proponent.
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|