Re: [ga] All future names should be sponsored

["kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

EXACTLY!

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Karl Auerbach" <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] All future names should be sponsored


>
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Danny Younger wrote:
>
> > With regard to selection criteria, the Business
> > Constituency has argued that "all future names should
> > be sponsored".
>
> > Comments?
>
> Yes, I'll accept "sponsored-only" TLDs when the bussiness "constituency"
> accepts that no new business may be started and no new product or service
> be released until a sponsoring organization is created that has to apply
> for permission from the "New Businesses, Products, and Services
> Corporation", pay a heafty application fee, and undergo extensive
> inquiries into the color, shape, and usibility by dingos.
>
>   --karl--
>