<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] politicisation of the internet
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] politicisation of the internet
- From: RBHauptman@xxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:00:42 EST
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Because right now it is only ONE government that is running the whole show,
the USA. It seems rather facile that other governments don't like that. And
want to change that. Not quite sure why you and others don't understand
that. Why should they want to keep the status quo when it leaves them out.
Makes perfect and logical sense. Darn rationale too.
kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
The European Unionâs compromise formula, proposing governments get a say in
the policy, but keeping them out of Icannâs day-to-day decision-making could
be the way forward, though the contours of its formula need to be clarified.
It is also imperative to build safeguards to ensure there is no politicisation
of technical decision-making, slowing of innovation or scope for government
control. Any alternative that compromises on the free-wheeling nature of the
internet must be eschewed. With apologies to Paul McCartney, weâd urge the
meeting in Tunis to âlet it be, let it be..â
_http://www.financialexpress.com/fe_full_story.php?content_id=108803_
(http://www.financialexpress.com/fe_full_story.php?content_id=108803)
There already is politicisation of the decisions being made. How will adding
more government involvement make it less so?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|